Skip to main content

Kim Jong-un’s secret visit to Beijing: A dress rehearsal for the planned meeting

Beijing’s diplomatic quarters were clouded by speculations and surprise accompanied by what experts described as a strange, highly mysterious, visit by the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. 

To anyone closely following the North Korean issue, prospects of this abruptly planned visit of Kim to Beijing including a meeting with Xi raises questions on what North Korea is planning to signal, a sudden unforeseen surge of diplomacy after years of provoking nuclear threats on bombing the U.S territories interspersed by potential missile tests. Talks are scheduled first with President Moon Jae-in of South Korea in April and later with President Trump, perhaps in May. 

According to various sources, Kim did his schooling in Switzerland near Bern, he had never traveled abroad since becoming the North Korea’s leader in 2011 after his father’s death. Nor he has never met any head of state or leader so far.
. (Xinhua/Ju Peng)
For China, meeting with their strategic neighbor makes certain that Beijing will not be sidelined during the talks or any deal struck between the U.S – North Korea – South Korea talks. Considering the history of China’s role in Korean Peninsula, Beijing doesn’t want to be a mere bystander in the planned trilateral talks.

Xinhua, the official state news agency of China reported that Kim said: "It is our consistent stand to be committed to denuclearization on the peninsula." 

KCNA, the North Korean state media said Xi had accepted “with pleasure” an invitation to visit North Korea on a yet-to-be-announced date.

Kim’s Beijing visit gives a strong position in the upcoming planned meeting with Trump, said Wang Peng, a North Korea expert at the Charhar Institute in Beijing.
Photos released by North Korean state media.
“North Korea is seeking assurances,” he added. “They want to quickly mend ties with China so that they have more leeway with the United States and they have more confidence in a good outcome.”
“At the end of the day, China’s got huge interests and it was not comfortable not being at the table,” said Paul Haenle, director of the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center in Beijing and a White House representative to the Six-Party Talks from 2007-2009.

“Kim Jong un’s first meeting with a head of state was with the Chinese president, which frankly from the Chinese perspective is exactly the right thing,” he added.

With the recent high-level shuffles at the White House such as John Bolton, whose goal is not just denuclearization, but regime change, becoming the NSA, may have put some gravity on North Korea before the talks. 
By his China visit, Kim is signaling Washington and Seoul that North Korea has other options and that they are not alone. 
“China worries about being bypassed by North Korea and Trump,” says Shen Zhihua, a prominent historian in China. “China fears some collusion and fears its interests being disregarded.”

In the recent years, and after Kim coming to power, North Korea has become a thorn in China’s calculus. Beijing’s diplomatic quarter is worried that North Korean provocations could restart war-like hostilities with the US, which will make North Korea less reliant on Chinese shelter, Kim’s over-ambitious nuclear plans reduce Beijing’s options to handle North Korean policy.

For China, it wants to be seen as a warden of peace and stability in the region and also a viable player in global diplomacy as it competes with the US for influence in Asia.
While China at times joins the west chorus of torpedoing North Korea with sanctions for its nuclear ambitions, it has also been cautious not to press North Korea hard enough to risk a regime collapse, which would eventually lead to the formation of a puppet government under an American security umbrella, a strain on China’s border.
North Korea has realized that it cannot survive a sustained economic sanction, and would need China’s backing for easing of trade restrictions. Now, Kim Jong-un could seek for a de-escalation of hardline sanctions as a concession for agreeing to talks. 
A photograph released by North Korea's state-run Korean Central News Agency.
North Korea is also paying the price from China’s denial to import North Korean coal, which is in accord with UN sanctions, and also to export to North Korea all the oil that it needs to fuel its ramshackle economy.

“He’s playing one superpower against another,” said Xia Yafeng, a historian at Long Island University.

If what Kim says is true, that he has nukes capable of striking their archenemy, the US, then it is time for him to focus on rebuilding, already in shamble, North Korean economy, and for which he needs the help of China.

This article was originally published in The Kootneeti, a news magazine based in New Delhi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why countries supported, opposed and abstained the UNGA resolution: Decoding the voting pattern

“The recent emergency United Nations General Assembly session summoned to mandate on President Trump's decision to shift the American Embassy to Jerusalem resulted in another toothless non-binding resolution against Israel. It is neither new nor surprising on seeing the UNGA votes on Israel – considering the U.S. veto at the UNSC, the UNGA has always been a popular forum for passing anti-Israel resolutions in the past. But, this time the resolution explicitly and strategically distanced many countries from the United States in its condemnation of President Trump's decision. Despite the threats from President Trump and his UN ambassador Nikki Haley, most countries voted against Washington. If the U.S. wants to really establish peace in Jerusalem, it is better they drop the plans to cut funds and work constructively in talks. Only diplomacy and negotiations, not bullying and hatred, can establish peace in the world especially in the Middle East.”  Despite the caveats torpedoe

The U.S. government Shutdown ends with a deal: The Key Takeaways

The U.S. government “shutdown” was definitely, a huge news that seized the headlines of almost every major newspaper – world’s most powerful country is closed. For the people who missed the entire encounter, the shutdown of the U.S federal government began at midnight EST on Saturday, January 20, 2018, after a failure to clear a ‘continuing resolution’ bill to fund the government and its operations. On Monday, President Trump signed, behind closed doors of the White House, a bill officially capping off a 69-hour display of partisan dysfunction which led to a government shutdown, the signed bill will disburse funds to run the federal operations until February 8, according to sources. Both the houses of the Congress voted the bill earlier on Monday, extending funds for next three weeks, only because of the deal reached between Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. It was mainly on bipartisan grounds related to the immigration issue

PM Modi at Davos: What can be expected?

If one goes by some selective parameters, the world is definitely on an optimistic path, a vibrant one with a healthy future. The global economy is robust, growing from the U.S to India, China to Southern Africa, Brazil to Australia, European markets on a fast recovery mode, progressing technology and energetic stock markets like never before. Getting consumed by all these euphoric numbers, we often tend to overlook certain parameters, exploring deep gives us an altered picture, in simple, we need to worry about a lot of things from growing inequality, concentration of economic wealth in a few, falling governance standards, lack of political consensus while solving global threats and so on. In the recent past, the global setting has evolved swiftly: geostrategic fractures have re-emerged on several fronts with across-the-board political and socio-economic consequences. On global political context, ‘Realpolitik’ is no more a cold war vocabulary. Economic affluence and social con